Thread Various / Original thread

Alright, I'm gonna break this down since I don't see anyone else really covering it in this…

Original posts. Original order. Sources and media stay with them.

By Gus Quixote

June 27, 20239 posts2 source URLs6 archived media items
Back to threads
01June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
***THREAD***

Alright, I'm gonna break this down since I don't see anyone else really covering it in this context.

I wouldn't have known this either, had it not been for Covid two years ago, sitting in a room alone, 2000 miles away from my home.

I believe CNN is running an info op.
https://t.co/AWxCZ13zEA
1 source link
02June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
2/

This conversation highlights ONLY General Mark milley's plans to invade Iran.

This is especially peculiar to me in light of my own discoveries into the Biden family's track record with their interests overlapping those of Iran.

It's almost as though one side facilitates a problem and other people from the same side provide a solution in these scenarios.
03June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
3/

Trump specifically says all of the right things to make it clear what is going on AND his intent behind saying these things - he's showing this to highlight that the scenario is in fact the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what Milley is protraying.

He also MAKES IT CLEAR it is the "DEFENSE DEPARTMENT AND HIM."
04June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
4/

"This was done BY THE MILITARY and given to me...

See as President I COULD HAVE DECLASSIFIED IT...Now I can't, you know, but this is still a secret..."

NOW WE HAVE A PROBLEM."

If what Milley was doing was in ANY WAY CONNECTED to ANY KNOWLEDGE of the Biden's dealings with Iran, this would create a HUGE legal quagmire.

What could the "problem" be?
I believe he said this as a "Trumpism."
05June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
5/

Trump knew the law and the standing Executive Order that he could have just as easily rescinded the way Biden did on day one with his slew of rescinded Trump EO's.

Instead, he let the EO roll, but WHY???

Specifically in regards to this issue...
-
https://t.co/Pzf8mOyfZ3
Section 1.7 of EO 13526 states:

"In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:

-conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error
-prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency
---------------
ADDITIONALLY:
Information may not be reclassified after declassification and release to the public under proper authority unless:

-the information may be reasonably recovered without bringing undue attention to the information.
---------------

BUT THERE'S STILL MORE
1 source link
06June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
6/

Section 1.8 of EO 13526 states:

Authorized holders of information who, in good faith, believe that its classification status is improper are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification status of the information in accordance with agency procedures established under paragraph (b) of this section.

Did Trump not already say that he submitted his documents to NARA for review and that they had all been working on the process together?

Why was this halted? Does the halting of this review and Jack Smith's new prosecution of Trump over the issue now raise a violation of Section 1.8 as well???
07June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
7/

All of my threads are in my "Highlights" section on my profile!
08June 27, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
*she
09October 30, 2023Gus Quixote9-post record
Can anyone see this thread!?!?!?
Search the receipts

Start typing. Articles, threads, authors, and collections are all in the same file.